Case LawHigh Court › Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd v. Income...

Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 06 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
06 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.01.0714:43:56+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 404 OF 2009 Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd.vs.1. Income Tax Officer,Range 10(3)(4)& 2 Ors. ...Petitioner ...Respondents Mr.K. Gopal a/w. Mr.Om Kandalkar i/b Mr. Jitendra Singh for petitioner. Mr.Suresh Kumar for respondents. CORAM :K.R. SHRIRAM & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.DATE :6[th] JANUARY, 2022(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) P.C.: 1. Mr.Gopal states that petitioner had approached this Court in viewof respondent No.1’s passing an order dated 23[rd] December 2008 andtaking recourse to provisions to section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act,1961. Mr. Gopal further states that said order has been subsequentlywithdrawn and assessment has been concluded. Therefore, nothingsurvives in the petition and seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 2.Petition dismissed as withdrawn. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan