Kota Karamchari Sahkari Samiti Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Kota
High Court
14 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Kota Karamchari Sahkari Samiti Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Kota
Date of order
14 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Kota Karamchari Sahkari Samiti Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Kota, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
[2024:RJ-JP:7694-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6155/2004
Kota Karamchari Sahkari Samiti Ltd. through its President ShriShrikrishan Birla, S/o Shri Onkar Lal Ji Birla aged about 75 yearsR/o Birla Bhawan, Kathunipol, Kota.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Kota.
2. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kota.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sanjay Jhanwar, Sr.Adv. With Mr.Rajat SharmaMr.Rajat SharmaFor Respondent(s): Mr.Shantanu Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (ORAL):
14/02/2024
1.This petition is filed seeking directions for issuance ofcertificate under Section 197 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short“the Act”) for non-deduction of tax at source for assessment year2005-06. Further, there is challenge to re-assessment proceedingsinitiated under Section 147 of the Act for assessment years 1999-2000 to 2002-03.
2.Learned Senior Counsel – Mr.Sanjay Jhanwar, assisted bylearned counsel – Mr.Rajat Sharma, appearing for the petitioner, atthe outset fairly submits that first prayer has been renderedinfructuous with the ellfux of time.
3.Inter-alia the grievance raised for challenging re-assessmentproceedings is that the department has not proceeded as per lawlaid down by Supreme Court in the case of G.K.N. Driveshafts(India) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer & Ors. reported in 259ITR page 19.
4.Learned counsel for the respondents submits that liberty begranted to department to proceed in accordance with law.
5.Without commenting upon merits of the case, the writpetition is disposed of. The matter is remitted back to therespondent No.1 - Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Kota to proceedin pursuance to the impugned notices in accordance with law.
6.Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to raiseall the legal grounds available to it.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Preeti Asopa /8
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.