Kota Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
09 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Kota Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Kota Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 6.The appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 117 / 2017
Kota Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd
----Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jai Kumar Yadav
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Parinitoo Jain
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS
Order
09/05/2017
1.Heard counsel for the appellant.
2.The Tribunal in para 5 observed as under:-
“I have heard the ld. DR and perused thematerial available on the record. From perusal ofthe Form No. 36, it transpires that, instead ofgrounds of appeal, only “addition should bedeleted” is mentioned. Thus, the ground itself isvery vague and which is not as per ITAT Rules.Considering all the aspects including the vaguegrounds of appeal taken by the assessee, I findno merit in the appeal of assessee and the samestands dismissed.”
3.In our considered opinion, instead of going into technicality,
the Tribunal ought to have allowed the appellant to rectify themistake.
4.Counsel for the appellant will appear before the Tribunal on5[th] June, 2017.
5.The order of the Tribunal is set aside and the matter isremitted back to the Tribunal to decide the same on merits. Thecost of Rs. 5,000/- will be paid to the department.
6.The appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent.
7.We have not expressed any opinion on merit. The amendedcause title will be filed within two weeks from today, which will be
served to the department.
(VIJAY KUMAR VYAS),J.
(K.S. JHAVERI),J.
A.Sharma/304
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.