Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund v. Income Tax Officer 19(3)(2) & Ors
High Court
14 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund v. Income Tax Officer 19(3)(2) & Ors
Date of order
14 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund v. Income Tax Officer 19(3)(2) & Ors, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION LODGING NOS.607 TO 612 OF 2012
Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
...Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer 19(3)(2) & ors....Respondents
Mr.S.E.Dastur, Senior Advocate with Mr.Madhur Agarwal and Mr.Atul K. Jasani for petitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for respondents
CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
March 14, 2012.
P.C.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the counsel
appearing for the Revenue state that the facts of the present petitions are similar to those in Writ Petition Lodging No.606 of 2012 which has been
wpl-607 to 612-2012
disposed of by a judgment delivered today except for the fact that there is no attachment of the bank accounts in these petitions. No separate submissions have been urged by either side in these petitions. Consequently, for the reasons which have been indicated by the Court while disposing of Writ Petition Lodging No.606 of 2012, the petitions shall stand disposed of with a direction that pending disposal of the appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and for a period of six weeks thereafter, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner to enforce the demand contained in the notice dated 29 February 2012 (Exhibit M to the petitions). There shall be no order as to costs.
(DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.