Kozhikode Daya Hospitals Private Limited, V-302 And v. Menonmeera V.menon
High Court
23 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Kozhikode Daya Hospitals Private Limited, V-302 And v. Menonmeera V.menon
Date of order
23 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kozhikode Daya Hospitals Private Limited, V-302 And v. Menonmeera V.menon, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 23 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 26119 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
KOZHIKODE DAYA HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED, V-302 AND 303, SHORNUR ROAD, NEAR VIYYUR BRIDGE, THRISSUR -680 022, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.P. AHAMMED KOYA.BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS ),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 0012COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI110 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.26119 of 2021
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 23[rd] day of November, 2021JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to
assessment year 2015-16, petitioner has preferred a secondappeal before the 2[nd] respondent, a copy of which isproduced as Ext.P2. A petition for stay of proceedingspursuant to the assessment order has also been filed asExt.P3. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to beeffected even before the petition for stay is considered.Hence this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel
for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of theopinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of witha direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]
respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 staypetition, within a period of three months from the date of
WP(C) NO. 26119 OF 2021
3
receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision is
taken, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE
AJM
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26119/2021
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16.
Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL
AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.