Case Law › High Court › Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd. … v. Ad...

Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd. … v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax ……

High Court 12 Jul 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

12 Jul 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd. … v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax ……, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The present appeals are dismissed in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA 205/2010 titled Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : 03.07.2012 Decided on : 12.07.2012 ITA 163/2011, ITA 1215/2011 & ITA 1216/2011 KRISHAK BHARATI COOPERATIVE LTD. ….. Appellant Through: Mr. S.Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Surekha Raman and Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocates Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX …… Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeals are dismissed in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA 205/2010 titled Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd. Vs. Deputy CIT. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) July 12, 2012 R.V. EASWAR (JUDGE)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.