Case LawHigh Court › Krishnan Rajendran v. Assistant Commissi...

Krishnan Rajendran v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle 1,Tirunelveli

High Court 11 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Krishnan Rajendran v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle 1,Tirunelveli
Date of order
11 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Krishnan Rajendran v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle 1,Tirunelveli, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: With the above direction, this Writ Petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD).No.21878 of 2023 andW.M.P.(MD).No.18263 of 2023 Krishnan Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 1,Tirunelveli.... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent contained in impugned order issued vide DIN & Letter No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2023-24/1054500142(1) dated 21.07.2023 for the assessment year 2017-18 passed by the respondent, quash the same as arbitrary, unjust and illegal. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Mansoor Ilahi For Respondent : Mr.J.Parekh Kumar ORDER By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. This Writ Petition is filed to quash the order dated 21.07.2023 for the assessment year 2017-18 passed by the respondent. 3. The petitioner has already preferred statutory appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and also filed an application for stay of the impugned order. In the meanwhile, the assessing officer issued notice dated 21.07.2023, directing the petitioner to pay 20% of the assessed amount Rs.33,10,503/- which comes to Rs.6,62,101/-. But the petitioner is expressing his financial difficulty. 4. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that instead of 20%, the petitioner shall pay 5% of the assessed amount and the same shall be paid within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(MD).No.21878 of 2023 order. On such payment, the recovery is stayed. The appeal shall be disposed within a period of six months therefrom. 5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 11.09.2023 NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ NoNsr To Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 1,Tirunelveli. W.P.(MD).No.21878 of 2023 S.SRIMATHY, J. Nsr W.P.(MD).No.21878 of 2023 11.09.2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan