Case LawHigh Court › Kriti Securities Consultants Private Lim...

Kriti Securities Consultants Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 30(1), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 19 May 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Kriti Securities Consultants Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 30(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
19 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
2023-24
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Kriti Securities Consultants Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 30(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
OD–7 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE WPO/236/2025 KRITI SECURITIES CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD – 30(1), KOLKATA & ORS. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: 19[th] May, 2025 Appearance :Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Ms. Sretapa Sinha, Adv. Ms. Sruti Datta, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Singhi, Adv. …for the petitioner Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Mr. Ankan Das, Adv. Ms. Shradhya Ghosh, Adv. ..for the Income Tax Mr. Syamantak Banerjee, Adv. Mr. P. K. Dutt, Adv. Mr. S. K. Dutt, Adv. …for the respondent no.6 The Court :- 1. This matter pertains to the alleged claim made by the petitioner that the petitioner is unable to file its return online for the assessment year 2023-24 as the portal is rejecting the return in ITR-6 due to the PAN. 2. It appears that a series of representations were made, starting from 15[th] March, 2022 and lastly on 13[th] November, 2024. 3. Since the respondents are yet to dispose of the representations, I am of the view that, at this stage, it would be prudent to direct the concerned assessing officer of the petitioner to take a decision in this matter upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and by passing a reasoned order as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Since no affidavit has been called for, the allegations made in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. (RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.) akg/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan