Kumud Chand Jain v. Income Tax Ofïcer Ward
High Court
23 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Kumud Chand Jain v. Income Tax Ofïcer Ward
Date of order
23 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Kumud Chand Jain v. Income Tax Ofïcer Ward, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.In view of above, the present petition is dismissed with theliberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3637/2016
Kumud Chand Jain s/o Late Shri Shanti Lal Jain, age 47 years, r/o63, Shopping Centre, Near Pital Factory, Jhotwara, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax OfÏcer Ward No. 1, Jaipur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir JainFor Respondent(s): Mr. Laxman Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSALOrder
23/01/2024
1.By way of instant criminal miscellaneous petition filed underSection 482 Cr.P.C., petitioner challenged the proceedings ofcriminal case No. 15/2013 titled Income Tax OfÏcer Vs. KumudChand Jain pending before the Court of Chief MetropolitanMagistrate (Economic Offence), Jaipur Metropolitan-II.
2.Counsel for the petitioner after arguing the petition for sometime, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition in order totake all legal and valid objections including the subsequent fact ofdeciding the appeal in favour of petitioner before the trial Courtduring course of trial in accordance with law.
3.In view of above, the present petition is dismissed with theliberty as prayed for.
4.Stay application and any other pending application, if any,stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue