In Kunal Dhanpal Shah v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(1) Or His Successor, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Permission, as sought for, is granted.The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.Notice is discharged.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5507 of 2022
================================================================
KUNAL DHANPAL SHAH
VersusASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1)(1) OR HISSUCCESSOR
================================================================
Appearance:
MR SN DIVATIA(1378) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MR KARAN SANGHANI FOR M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAIandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 21/06/2022 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI)
Learned advocate Mr.S.N. Divatia for thepetitioner, under instructions, seeks permissionto withdraw this petition in view of thesubsequent development i.e. passing of theAssessment Order dated 24.03.2022 by therespondent authority.
Permission, as sought for, is granted.The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.Notice is discharged.
(A.J.DESAI, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue