Case LawHigh Court › Ku.pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main R...

Ku.pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main Road, Kulumani, Trichy-639 103 v. Mr.karthik Ranganathansenior Standing Counsel

High Court 10 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Ku.pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main Road, Kulumani, Trichy-639 103 v. Mr.karthik Ranganathansenior Standing Counsel
Date of order
10 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ku.pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main Road, Kulumani, Trichy-639 103 v. Mr.karthik Ranganathansenior Standing Counsel, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP No.9721 of 2025 in TCA SR No.49048 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CMP No.9721 of 2025 in TCA SR No.49048 of 2025 Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle - 2(3), Chennai-600 034. Ku.Pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main Road, Kulumani, Trichy-639 103. Vs Petitioner Respondent For Petitioner: Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Counsel states that he has filed a better affidavit affirmed on 9.6.2025, copy whereof has already been served on respondent along with __________ Page 1 of 2 CMP No.9721 of 2025 in TCA SR No.49048 of 2025 appeal, etc. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the better affidavit filed by Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, affirmed on 9.6.2025, delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Appeal be numbered and listed for admission on 17.6.2025. (K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 10.06.2025 sasi __________ Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan