Ku.pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main Road, Kulumani, Trichy-639 103 v. Mr.karthik Ranganathansenior Standing Counsel
High Court
10 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Ku.pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main Road, Kulumani, Trichy-639 103 v. Mr.karthik Ranganathansenior Standing Counsel
Date of order
10 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ku.pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main Road, Kulumani, Trichy-639 103 v. Mr.karthik Ranganathansenior Standing Counsel, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP No.9721 of 2025
in TCA SR No.49048 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICEAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CMP No.9721 of 2025
in TCA SR No.49048 of 2025
Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle - 2(3), Chennai-600 034.
Ku.Pa. Krishnan,Tamilpannai House Main Road, Kulumani, Trichy-639 103.
Vs
Petitioner
Respondent
For Petitioner:
Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Counsel states that he has filed a better affidavit affirmed on 9.6.2025, copy whereof has already been served on respondent along with
__________
Page 1 of 2
CMP No.9721 of 2025 in TCA SR No.49048 of 2025
appeal, etc.
2. For the reasons mentioned in the better affidavit filed by Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, affirmed on 9.6.2025, delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
Appeal be numbered and listed for admission on 17.6.2025.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 10.06.2025
sasi
__________
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.