Kusum Vijaykumar Panchmatia, Civil Lines, Nagpur v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-4, Nagpur And Ors
High Court
18 Jun 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Kusum Vijaykumar Panchmatia, Civil Lines, Nagpur v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-4, Nagpur And Ors
Date of order
18 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Kusum Vijaykumar Panchmatia, Civil Lines, Nagpur v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-4, Nagpur And Ors, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The petition accordingly stands partly allowed and disposed of.No costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.2329 OF 2025
Kusum Vijaykumar Panchmatia, Civil Lines, Nagpur
-vs-
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-4, Nagpur and ors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's ordersor directions and the Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Kapil Hirani, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate with Shri Bhushan Mohata, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : June 18, 2025
1. Shri Anand Parchure, the learned counsel appearing for therespondents, on instructions states that the appeal filed by thepetitioner shall be decided within a period of six weeks from today.
2. We accept the statement as it is made on instructions from therespondents.
3. The petition accordingly stands partly allowed and disposed of.No costs.
(Sachin S. Deshmukh, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.)
Asmita
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue