K.viswanathanbrother And Power Of Attorney Tok.shunmugam v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle Iiitiruchirapalli
High Court
16 Dec 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
K.viswanathanbrother And Power Of Attorney Tok.shunmugam v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle Iiitiruchirapalli
Date of order
16 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In K.viswanathanbrother And Power Of Attorney Tok.shunmugam v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle Iiitiruchirapalli, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the same, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.A.(MD) No.929 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMANand
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
W.A.(MD) No.929 of 2021
K.ViswanathanBrother and Power of Attorney toK.Shunmugam
... Appellant
-vs-
Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCircle IIITiruchirapalli... Respondent
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 03.11.2020, passed in W.P.(MD) No.5542 of 2012, on the file of
this Court.
For Appellant:Mr.S.M.S.Johnny BashaFor Respondent:Mr.N.Dilip Kumar
____________
Page 1 of 3
W.A.(MD) No.929 of 2021
J U D G M E N T
[Judgment of the Court was made by RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.]
Learned counsel for the appellant has given a letter dated 13.12.2024 to the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal.
2. Recording the same, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No
costs.
NCC :Yes / NoIndex :Yes / NoInternet :Yes / No
[T.K.R., J.] [N.S., J.] 16.12.2024
krk
____________
Page 2 of 3
____________
Page 3 of 3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD) No.929 of 2021
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.ANDN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
krk
W.A.(MD) No.929 of 2021
16.12.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.