Case LawHigh Court › La No: 1 Of 2018 v. Ramana Rao

La No: 1 Of 2018 v. Ramana Rao

High Court 13 Jul 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
La No: 1 Of 2018 v. Ramana Rao
Date of order
13 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In La No: 1 Of 2018 v. Ramana Rao, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE fHIRTEENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 260 oF 2018 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B',Hyderabad in lTA.No.149/Hyd/1 5 for assessment year 20'10-1 1 dated 30.11.2017preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vl,Hyderabad, Appeal No.009512013-1 4lcll (A)-Vl, dated 12.1 1.201 4, preferred againstthe Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-7(1), Hyderabad PAN/GlR No.AAHFK9996Ldated 27.03.2013.the Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-7(1), Hyderabad PAN/GlR No.AAHFK9996Ldated 27.03.2013. Between: M/s.Kamineni Builders, H.No.10-3-316.A, MasabTank, Hyderabad.FAN: [pAuFk ][71qoL] ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ANDThe Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(1), Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/APPELLANT lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all furtherproceedings prosecution pursuant to the order of the tribunal dated 30-11-2017 inlTA.No.149/Hyd/2015 for the year 2010-11 pending disposal of the ITTA.lTA.No.149/Hyd/2015 for the year 2010-11 pending disposal of the ITTA. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI T. V. RAMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: -- The Court delivered the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR r.T.T.A. NO.260 0F 2018 ORDER: (Pet Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao) Leamed counsel for the appellant has filed a letter seeking towithdraw this Appeal on the ground that the appellant has opted forVivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020 and the Designated Authority has issuedForn-r No.3. 2, Therefore, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty tothe appellant to revive the Appeal in the event there is no satisfactoryresolution under the said Scheme. To, 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Appeal shall alsostand dismissed. No co SD/.M.SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRARl^{\----'SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY' 1. The lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad'] 2. The Commissioner of [lncome Tax (Appeals-Vl), Hyderabad'] 3. The lncome Tax Officer, [Ward-7(1), Hyderabad] 4. One CC to Sri T. V. Ramana [Rao, ][Advocate ] 5. Two CD Copies 6. One Spare [CoPY]gbrgbr HIGH COURT DATED: 1310712021 ORDERlTTA.No.260 of 2018 DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWN. srAr€1$,e)oo29 Juz$ll**DEsPAJc
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan