La No:2 Of 2024 v. Sc For Income Tax Depa.rtment

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR WRIT PETITION NO: 18335 OF 2024 Betwee n: Sri Venkatewsara Swamy Devasthanam, S.No.6, [Jamalapuram,]Jamalapuram 507201 , Telangana, rep by its [Executive Officer, ][Kothuru]Jaganmohan Rao, S/o. Late Radhakrishna N4ufihy, aged [about ][55 ]['y'eai's]R/o. Khammam, Telangana, P ETiTIO 1.1E R Al\ID 1Ur:on cf lndia, i\;!inisiry oi Finance, Rep by the Pi'l;'lcipal Cr;:i [Corr:rssior:r]of lncome tax, Telanganaof lncome tax, Telangana 2The lncome Tax Officer Exemptions, 3 Aayakar Bhavan [Basheerbagh]Hyderabad,Hyderabad, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia [praying ][that in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the [High ][Court may ][be]pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more [particularly ]in the [nature ][of]Certiorari declaring impugned Order No. [F. ][No.ITO(E)/W-1(3)/ Hyd /Consequential]12024-205 dated 02-05-2024 vide DIN No ITBA/GEA/IV1/25012024'2025110645961 63(1) for the AY. 2013-14, [passed ][by the ][2nd ][respondent, ][as]illegal, wholly without [jurisdiction, violative ]of [principles ][of ][natural ][justice ][and]fundamental rights of the Petitioner [under ][Article ][14 ][and ][consequently quash ][the]same, restrain the Respondents from taking [further action ][in ][purcuance ][to ][the]sa me lA NO:2 OF 2024 Petition under section 1 5 i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased tothe affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased torestra!n the Respondents from taking any fudhe!- action in pursuance to theimpug nedconsequential order No. F.No. ITO(E)/W_1(3y Hyd /Consequentialt2024-205dated 02-05-2024 vide DtN No. tTBAtGEAtMt2SOl2O24-202511064596163(.1 ) passed by the 2nd respondent.counsel for the petitioner: sRr v. RAJESHWAR RAo, RE,RESENTTNG FoRcounsel for the petitioner: sRr v. RAJESHWAR RAo, RE,RESENTTNG FoRSRI E. HARI BABU COUNSEI fOr thE RESPONdENT NO.1: SRI B. MUKHERJEE, REPRESENTING FORGADTPRAVEEN KUMAR Dy. SoLtClToR GEN. oFl-Nr;jA- Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A. RADHA KRISHNA. SC FOR INCOME TAX DEPA.RTMENT The Court made the following: ORDER \ THE AND ARAPU THE [H] [SRl JUSTICE ]ONN o.18335 of[2]o24 oFPER@er [Hon'bte ][SP'J)] Sri [V' ][Rajeshwar ][Rao' ][learned counsel ][representlng]Hari [Babu' ][learned ][counsel ][for ][the ][petitioner(s) ][' ][seeks ][to]Sri [E.]withdranv this [petition ][with ][the liberty ][to ][file ][afresh' ][if ][occasion]arlses.Sri [B' ][Mukherjee' learned ][counsel representing ][Sri ][Gadi]2. Praveen [Kumar' ][learned Deputy ][Solicitor ][General ][of ][India' for ][the]Government [and ][Sri A' ][Radha ][Krishna']"'respondent(s)-Central learnec [Senior ][standing counsel ][for ][Income ]["* j:':::":t' ]Tax [Department' ][have no ][objectron']the [respondent(s)-Income ] 3. Accordingly' [the ][Writ ][Petition ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrau'n]with [the ][liberty ][prayed ][for' ][No ][costs'] rnterrocutory [applications, ][if ][any ][pending, ][sha1l ][also ][stand] rnterrocutory closed. ^.r,.?I;{ffJt-,QtHSEcTloN [oFFlcER] 111RUE [coPYll ] "iHiE?E€'::E$llliTJ:ffiiH:"'ffi1'f [l'Elr:?''$f""13?iBi'] -tJ KKS 5 HIGH COURT DATED:05 tOBI2OZ4 6.\ [1dL ][s ][14]t qI1 E 2021t[I ).1,.L [i)].f,/\v ORDERWP.No.18335 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WTHOUT COSTS. @sq"s*.-z-1plr* II l