Labh Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Karnal, Haryana
High Court
06 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Labh Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Karnal, Haryana
Date of order
06 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Labh Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Karnal, Haryana, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 214 of 2018 (O&M) Decided on : 06.08.2018
Labh Singh
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Karnal, Haryana
. . . Appellant(s)
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocatefor the appellant(s)-assessee.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') impugning the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short 'the Tribunal'), Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh in ITA No. 1/CHANDI/2016, dated 05.08.2016 (Annexure A-4).
2.Learned counsel for the appellant-assessee submits that certain points were raised before the Tribunal, which have not been dealt with. Accordingly, a prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the appellant-assessee that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant appeal as well as misc. applications with liberty to the appellant-assessee to approach the Tribunal under Section 254(2) of the Act.
3.Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the appellant-assessee to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
August 06, 2018J.Ram
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/NoWhether Reportable: Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.