Case Law › High Court › Lalita Devi v. Dated: 11.03.2025

Lalita Devi v. Dated: 11.03.2025

High Court 11 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · jhar_pg

Parties

Date of order

11 Mar 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Lalita Devi v. Dated: 11.03.2025, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 3) In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 1205 of 2025 Lalita Devi, Aged About 41 Years, wife of Sanjay Kumar Sahu, , Village Umedanda, P.O.-Umedanda,, Police Station: Burmu, District: Ranchi-8352014 ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi, Ranchi, Having His Office At Central Revenue Building, Main Road, P.O.- Doranda, P.S.: Chutia, District: Ranchi-834001. His Office At Central Revenue Building, Main Road, P.O.- Doranda, P.S.: Chutia, District: Ranchi-834001. 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward -w2(1), Having His Office At Central Revenue Building, (Annexe), 4th Floor, Main Road, P.O.- Doranda, P.S.: Chutia, District: Ranchi-834001. Revenue Building, (Annexe), 4th Floor, Main Road, P.O.- Doranda, P.S.: Chutia, District: Ranchi-834001. … … ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner: None For the Respondents: _______ --------- 03/Dated: 11.03.2025 1) None appears for the petitioner. 2) Yesterday also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In the order passed yesterday, it was mentioned that if there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today, the writ petition would be dismissed for non-prosecution. petitioner. In the order passed yesterday, it was mentioned that if there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today, the writ petition would be dismissed for non-prosecution. 3) In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. prosecution. (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.