Larsen & Tourbo Infotech Limited, Mumbai v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing), Hyderabad And Another

VISHALSUBHASHPAREKAR Digitally signed byVISHAL SUBHASHPAREKARDate: 2022.02.0511:25:42 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.328 OF 2009 Larsen & Tourbo Infotech Limited, Mumbai ...Petitioner vs.The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Transfer Pricing), Hyderabad and Another ...Respondents Shri. J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Atul Jasani, for thePetitionerShri. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents. CORAM :K.R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2022 P.C.: .Shri Suresh Kumar on instructions states that since theassessment in Hyderabad is completed, Court may grant prayerclause (a). 2.Accordingly, prayer clause (a) which reads as under, isgranted. (a) This Court may be pleased to issue a writ ofcertiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or anyother appropriate writ, order or direction under Article226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records ofthe Petitioner’s case and after examining the legalityand validity thereof quash and set aside the notice dated23[rd] December, 2008 and 21[st] January, 2009 beingExhibit A and C hereto, issued by Respondent No. 1purportedly under section 133(6) of the Act and alsothe notice and summons both dated 2[nd] March, 2009 being Exhibit F and G issued by Respondent No. 3purportedly under section 131of the Act calling forcertain information and also set aside the notice dated4[th] February, 2009 being Exhibit E hereto, issued undersection 272A of the Act for imposition of penalty underthat section for alleged non-compliance of notices issuedunder section 133(6) of the Act. 3.Petition disposed. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)