Late Sh Ram Avtar Bhageria Lh Mr Purrshottam Bhaggeria v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 61 (1) New Delhi And Anr
High Court
27 Sep 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Late Sh Ram Avtar Bhageria Lh Mr Purrshottam Bhaggeria v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 61 (1) New Delhi And Anr
Date of order
27 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Late Sh Ram Avtar Bhageria Lh Mr Purrshottam Bhaggeria v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 61 (1) New Delhi And Anr, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 27.09.2021
+ W.P.(C) 10686/2021 & CM 32955/2021
LATE SH RAM AVTAR BHAGERIA LH MR PURRSHOTTAM BHAGGERIA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Ayush Puri, Adv.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 61 (1) NEW DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue with Mr.Vipul Agarwal, Jr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 1. This petition has been filed challenging the Notice dated 24[th ]June, 2021 issued by the respondent under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the name of the deceased, assessee late Sh. Ram Avtar Bhageria, for the Assessment Year 2017-18.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, placing reliance on the judgment of this Court in Savita Kapila, Legal Heir of Late Shri Mohinder Paul Kapila v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 43(1) Delhi, in W.P.(C) 3258 of 2020, submits that as the notice has been issued in favour of the assessee, who was no longer alive on the date of the notice, it is non est. He further submits that in the present case, the respondents were well aware of the death of the assessee as the income tax return on behalf of the assessee was filed by his LRs on 16[th] September, 2017.
3. To prove the factum of death, the petitioner has also placed on record the death certificate issued by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation.
4. The learned counsel for the respondent has not disputed the factum of death of the assessee prior to the issuance of the Impugned Notice. He, however, submits that in the present case, even if this Notice is set aside by this Court, the respondents still be entitled to issue a fresh notice to the LRs of the deceased assessee in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above and taking into account the judgment of this Court in Savita Kapila (supra), the Impugned Notice dated 24[th]June, 2021, having been issued in favour of the assessee who was no longer alive, is set aside. This order, however, shall not bar the respondents from issuing a fresh notice for the concerned Assessment Year to the LRs of the deceased assessee in accordance with law.
6. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MANMOHAN, J
SEPTEMBER 27, 2021/rv/ns/P
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.