Case LawHigh Court › Late Shri Nand Kishore Khandelwal, Throu...

Late Shri Nand Kishore Khandelwal, Through Legal Heir Shrirajesh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (2), Jaipur, Ncr Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur.statue Circle, Jaipur

High Court 17 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Late Shri Nand Kishore Khandelwal, Through Legal Heir Shrirajesh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (2), Jaipur, Ncr Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur.statue Circle, Jaipur
Date of order
17 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Late Shri Nand Kishore Khandelwal, Through Legal Heir Shrirajesh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (2), Jaipur, Ncr Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur.statue Circle, Jaipur, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 269/2023 Late Shri Nand Kishore Khandelwal, Through Legal Heir ShriRajesh Kumar Gupta S/o Late Shri Nand Kishore Khandelwal,Aged About 51 Years, R/o 2A-98, Subhash Colony, Shastri Nagar,Jaipur 302016, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (2), Jaipur, Ncr Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur.Statue Circle, Jaipur. 2. Union Of India, Through Finance Secretary, Ministry OfFinance (Department Of Revenue), Central Board OfDirect Taxes, North Block, New Delhi 110002Finance (Department Of Revenue), Central Board OfDirect Taxes, North Block, New Delhi 110002 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kanishk Singh, Adv. & Mr. Aditya Bohra, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Gunjan Pathak, Adv. For Respondent(s): Ms. Jaya P Pathak, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sandeep Pathak, Adv.Mr. Sandeep Pathak, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT 17/09/2025 Order 1.Both the learned counsels ad idem clearly state that theissue raised in the present writ petition stands finally adjudicatedby the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India vs RajeevBansal,SC 2024 INSC 754 wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Courtheld as under:- “112. Let us take the instance of a noticeissued on 1 May 2021 under the old regimefor a relevant assessment year. Because ofthe legal fiction, the deemed show causenotices will also come into effect from 1May 2021. After accounting for all theexclusions, the assessing officer will havesixty-one days [days between 1 May 2021and 30 June 2021] to issue a notice underissued on 1 May 2021 under the old regimefor a relevant assessment year. Because ofthe legal fiction, the deemed show causenotices will also come into effect from 1May 2021. After accounting for all theexclusions, the assessing officer will havesixty-one days [days between 1 May 2021and 30 June 2021] to issue a notice under Section 148 of the new regime. This timestarts ticking for the assessing officer afterreceiving the response of the assessee. Inthis instance, if the assessee submits theresponse on 18 June 2022, the assessingofficer will have sixty-one days from 18June 2022 to issue a reassessment noticeunderSection 148 of the new regime.Thus, in this illustration, the time limit forissuance of a notice under Section 148 ofthe new regime will end on 18 August2022.” 2.Keeping in view the above, the present writ petition stands dispose of, in the aforesaid terms mutatis mutandis 3.All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J HEENA/MAHIMA/95
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan