Latha C.mohan v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.09.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.27180 & 27195 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.28671 & 28693 of 2021 Latha C.Mohan ... Petitioner in both W.Ps. vs. 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai-3, Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward-6(1), Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. ( R, R2 Cause title amended vide Order dated 21.03.2023 madein WMP.No.29861/2021) ... Respondents in both W.Ps. Prayer in W.P.No.27180 of 2021: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in order bearing number 231213270290121 dated 29.01.2021 passed by the 1[st] respondent, quash the same and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/6 W.P.Nos.27180 & 27195 of 2021 consequently direct the 1[st] and 2[nd] respondent to accept the declaration filed by the petitioner under DTVSV Act. Prayer in W.P.No.27195 of 2021: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorariied Mandamus, calling for the records in the impugned order bearing acknowledgement Numbers 137727150080121 and 137841360080121 for 2009-2010 and 2010-11 respectively dated 08.01.2021 passed by the 1[st] respondent , quash the same and consequently direct the 1[st] and 2[nd] respondent to accept the declaration filed by the petitioner under DTVSV Act. For Petitioner( both W.Ps.) : Mr.K.Senguttuvan For Respondent ( both W.Ps) : Mrs.S.Premalatha Junior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned orders dated 29.01.021 and 08.01.2021 respectively passed under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 for the following Assessment years 2009 to 2013 W.P.Nos.27180 & 27195 of 2021 2. By the impugned order, the applications filed by the petitioner to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 has been rejected on the ground that no appeal was pending on the specified date as defined in the aforesaid Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had indeed filed appeals, both before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the respective assessment years. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the Finance Act, 2024 Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme was re-introduced which gives a liberty to the petitioner to settle the dispute. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the W.P.Nos.27180 & 27195 of 2021 issue is squarely covered against the petitioner as per the decision of this Court rendered in W.P.Nos.19466 of 2021 etc batch dated 29.04.2022 in the case of M/s.Cortex Enterprises Rep,.by its Partner Mr.Aamir vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -1, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Chennai 600 104 and 2 Others. 6. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be able to apply under new Scheme if there is a direction to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to dispose of the applications filed for condonation of delay in filing the appeals against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and that of the Assessing Officer which are said to be pending for the respective assessment years. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and I am of the view, the present writ petitions are liable to be dismissed. It is open for the petitioner to settle the dispute under the New scheme if the petitioner is so desires and otherwise qualified, to settle the dispute under the New Scheme. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and I am of the view, the present writ petitions are liable to be dismissed. It is open for the petitioner to settle the dispute under the New scheme if the petitioner is so desires and otherwise qualified, to settle the dispute under the New Scheme. 8. Suffice to state that the suitable applications for condonation of the delay filed before the respective Forum for the respective assessment years may be disposed by the respective forums to enable the petitioner to avail the benefit of Amnesty under the Finance Act, 2004. 9. With the above liberty, these writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 06.09.2024 Index : Yes/ No Internet : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/Nokkd To 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai-3, Aayakar Bhawan, 121, Chennai-3, Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward-6(1), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.27180 & 27195 of 2021 Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. C.SARAVANAN, J. kkd W.P.No.27180 & 27195 of 2021 06.09.2024