Laxman Chit Fund & Finance Limited, Rep. Mg v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Another
High Court
29 Jan 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Laxman Chit Fund & Finance Limited, Rep. Mg v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Another
Date of order
29 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Laxman Chit Fund & Finance Limited, Rep. Mg v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Another, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
W.P.NOs. 22005,29021, 29044, 29049,29050, 29060,29061& 29065 OF 2009
29-01-2010
BETWEEN;
Laxman Chit Fund & Finance Limited, rep. Mg.Partner D.Kanthamani
vs.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) and another
...Petitioner
...Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
W.P.NOs. 22005,29021, 29044, 29049,29050, 29060,29061& 29065 OF 2009
ORAL COMMON ORDER: (Per RR,J)
As the substantive appeals are pending before the Commissioner ofAppeals, and these writ petitions have been filed seeking stay of collection of thedisputed tax pending disposal of the appeals, we record the conjointsubmissions of both Dr.C.P.Ramaswami, learned counsel for petitioners and SriS.R.Ashok learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the I.T. Departmentthat it would suffice if this court were to hold that the appeals pending before theCommissioner of Appeals be entertained and disposed of on the petitioners’depositing 10% of the disputed tax pending disposal of appeals byCommissioner of Appeals.
As we have already directed the petitioners to pay 10% of the disputed taxby way of interim orders of this Court dated 31.12.2009 (quantified amount), andthe petitioners have already deposited the said 10% of the disputed tax, thesewrit petitions are disposed of directing the Commissioner of Appeals to disposeof the appeals pending before him expeditiously. No order as to costs.
29[th] JANUARY 2010.TSNR
______________
GODA RAGHURAM,J
__________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.