Case Law › High Court › Laxmi Bai Wio Late Bhunwar Kumar v. Resg...

Laxmi Bai Wio Late Bhunwar Kumar v. Resgondentsl 1 . Gokul Baghel

High Court 14 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

14 Aug 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Laxmi Bai Wio Late Bhunwar Kumar v. Resgondentsl 1 . Gokul Baghel, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURW Division Bench Coram:Hon’ble Shri Jagdish Bhaila, Acting C.J. 8:Hon’ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.M.C.C. No.231 of 2007Aggellants1.Mahendra Kumar, S/o Late VijayClaimantsKumarPandey,agedabout25yrs.RiteshKumar,S/oLateVijayKumarPandey,agedabout19yrs.AllRioAmapara,NagarNigamColony,Raipur,Tah&Distt.Raipur—' (CG)LaxmiBaiWioLateBhunwarKumar, Aged about 7O yrs.‘(NowDead)Smt.BarakhiLateVijayKumarR/oDate27/7/04Q.No.-04,Time-2, Income Tax Colony, CivilLine, Katora Talab, Raipur (CG)versusiResgondentsl1 .GokulBaghel,R/oNearofNon-agglicantsKalibadiNehruNagar, SweeperColony,RaipurTah&Dist.Raipur (CG)RameshKumarSachdeoS/oNarayanDas,R/oKalibadiChowk,Raipur,Tah&Distt.Raipur (CG)TheUnitedInsuranceCo.Ltd.BranchOffice-KrishnaComplex.throughB.M.Kachahari Chowk,Raipur,JailRoad,KachahariChowk,Raipur,Distt.Raipur(CG) ! Pfiya ORAL ORDER (Passed[on][ 14‘“]orAugust, 2007) ThefollowingoralorderoftheCourtwaspassedbyJagdish Bhalla, Acting Chief Justice: No one appears for the appellants when the matter was called‘for hearing. (2)Since no one had appeared on behalf of the appellants and norepresentation was made ontheir behalf, this M.C.Cis dismissedindefault of the appellants.No order as to costs. ’‘Sd-/ ff—~l‘Sd/- ‘{W_ll‘Dilip Raosaheb DeshmukhActing Chief Justice‘Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.