Laxmi Goel v. Income Tax Officer Ward

$~21 & 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2825/2020 & CM APPL. 9840/2020 LAXMI GOEL ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sumit Kumar, Advocate. versus 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO. 36(3) OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Through Mr. Zohreb Hussain, Sr. Standing Counse, Revenue with Mr. Parth Samual, Jr. Standing Counsel, Revenue. + W.P.(C) 2826/2020 & CM APPL. 9841/2020 BHARAT GOLA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sumit Kumar, Advocate. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. ..... Respondents Mr. Zohreb Hussain, Sr. Standing Counse, Revenue with Mr. Parth Samual, Jr. Standing Counsel, Revenue. Through % Date of Decision: 16[th] March, 2020 CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA W.P.(C) Nos.2825/2020 & 2826/2020 J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that that the Assessing Officer has not yet passed the orders in the applications filed by the petitioners under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Learned counsel for the petitioners also states that the petitioners would be satisfied, in case, the said applications are disposed of by the Assessing Officer expeditiously. 2. Accordingly, we direct the Assessing Officer to pass the orders in the applications filed by the petitioners under Section 220(6) of the Act, if not already passed, within the next two weeks. 3. The petitions along with the pending applications stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 4. We make it clear that we have not made any observations on the merits of the claims of the petitioners. MANMOHAN, J MARCH 16, 2020 KA SANJEEV NARULA, J W.P.(C) Nos.2825/2020 & 2826/2020