Ldc Metal & Minerals Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2) Kolkata & Ors
High Court
23 Jul 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Ldc Metal & Minerals Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2) Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
23 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ldc Metal & Minerals Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2) Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Since, the Assessment Order had been passed prior to filing of the writ petition and since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am of the view that nothing survives in the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
M/L 34 23.07.2025 sb Ct.5.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 4289 of 2025
LDC Metal & Minerals Private Limited Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2) Kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Amit Sharma Mr. Abhishek Kumar Agrahari
… For the respondents.
1. Although a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) dated 7[th] April, 2023 forms the subject matter of challenge in respect of the Assessment Year 2019-20, however, at the time of call the writ petitioner is not represented.
2. Mr. Sharma, learned advocate appears on behalf of the department and has placed before this Court the Assessment Order issued under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the said Act dated 3[rd] February, 2025 for the Assessment Year 2019-20 and would submit that even prior to filing of the writ petition, the Assessment Order had been passed.
3. Since, the Assessment Order had been passed prior to filing of the writ petition and since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am of the view that nothing survives in the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed.
4. The aforesaid order shall not impinge upon the petitioner’s rights to apply for statutory remedy against such order in accordance with law.
5. Let a copy of the Assessment Order, as placed before this Court by Mr. Sharma, be retained with the records.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.