Liberty Education Trust v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
02 Mar 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Liberty Education Trust v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Liberty Education Trust v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.319 OF 2010
Liberty Education Trust ..Petitioner.
Vs.
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai and another ..Respondents.
.....
Mr. F.V. Irani with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner.Mr. Yogesh Patki for the Respondents.
....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C. :
2[nd] March, 2010.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states during the course of the hearing of the Petition that he has instructions to state that the impugned order dated 29[th] October, 2009 passed by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai under Section 10(23-C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 shall be withdrawn and a fresh order shall be passed in accordance with law including after considering the judgment of the Supreme Court in American Hotel and Lodging Association Educational Institute v. Central Board
of Direct Taxes[1]. In view of the statement which has been made on behalf of the Respondents, counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner does not press the Petition which is upon request of the learned counsel permitted to be withdrawn. The Respondents shall abide by their statement. The Court is informed that the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax shall pass a fresh order within a period of two months from today.
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.