Liberty India v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, (2009) 317 Itr
High Court
18 Jan 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Liberty India v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, (2009) 317 Itr
Date of order
18 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Liberty India v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, (2009) 317 Itr, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: In the circumstances, the appeal shall stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.530 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I.... Appellant.
Vs.M/s.Win Laboratorties Ltd....Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the Appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &
18[th] January, 2010.
P.C.:
The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law :
“ Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal erred in holding that an amount of Rs.30,01,989/- representing duty drawback was income derived from assessee’s industrial undertaking and was therefore, eligible for deductions u/s.80-HH and 80-I of the Income Tax Act.”
The issue which arises in the appeal is covered against
the assessee by the judgment of the of the Supreme Court in
Liberty India vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, (2009) 317 ITR
218 (SC). Both the Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue
and Counsel appearing on behalf of the Assessee accept this position. In the circumstances, the appeal shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.