Case Law › High Court › Lilly v. Assistant Commissioner Of Incom...

Lilly v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another

High Court 29 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

29 Jul 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Lilly v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In this view of thematter, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution withliberty to seek revival as and when and if required.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Rajan Kumar2013.07.31 10:13I am the author of thisdocumentChandigarh IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH CWP No.8556 of 1989Date of Decision: 29.07.2013 Lilly ... Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the respondents. ***** RAJIVE BHALLA, J.(Oral) No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Evenotherwise as informed by counsel for the respondents, thepetitioner has passed away and no one has come forward to beimpleaded as her legal representative. In this view of thematter, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution withliberty to seek revival as and when and if required. (RAJIVE BHALLA)JUDGE (DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON)JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.