Linklaters v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax
High Court
03 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Linklaters v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Linklaters v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 806 OF 2019ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1222 OF 2011
LinklatersIn the matter between
..Applicant
..Appellant
Linklaters Versus
Deputy Director of Income Tax ..Respondent
.................
Mr. J.D.Mistri, a/w. Ms.Virangana Wadhawan i/b. EconomicLaws Practice for Appellant/Applicant.Laws Practice for Appellant/Applicant.
Mr.Arvind Pinto for Respondent.
…..............
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 3, 2020.
P.C. :
1.Heard Mr.Mistri, learned senior counsel for theappellant/applicant and Mr.Pinto for Respondent.
2.After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on dueconsideration, prayer for early hearing of Income Tax Appeal1222 of 2011 is allowed. Accordingly, let the appeal be listed forhearing on 12[th] March, 2020.
3.Notice of Motion is disposed of.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue