In Linklaters v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1030 OF 2019ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1222 OF 2011
Linklaters
..Applicant..Appellant
In the matter between
Linklaters
Versus
Deputy Director of Income Tax ..Respondent
.................
Mr. J.D.Mistri, a/w. Ms.Virangana Wadhawan i/b. EconomicLaws Practice for Appellant/Applicant.Laws Practice for Appellant/Applicant.
Mr.Arvind Pinto for Respondent.
…..............
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 3, 2020.
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.Mr.Pinto waives service for the respondent.
3.Leave to amend the related appeal being Income TaxAppeal No. 1222 of 2011 is granted. Let the amendment becarried out before the next hearing date.Appeal No. 1222 of 2011 is granted. Let the amendment becarried out before the next hearing date.
4.Chamber Summons is disposed of.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue