Liquidator & Co.op.officer v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Oct 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Liquidator & Co.op.officer v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Oct 2001
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Liquidator & Co.op.officer v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- LIQUIDATOR & CO.OP.OFFICER Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 80 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- LIQUIDATOR & CO.OP.OFFICER
Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 80 of 1987 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1
MR BB NAIK with MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 25/10/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�This is a reference at the instance of the assessee. However, when the reference is called out for hearing, none appears for the assessee, though served. �In view of the above, we decline to answer the questions referred for our opinion. �The reference accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (M.S. Shah, J.)�(D.A. Mehta, J.)
sundar/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.