List Has Been Revised v. U.p. Forest Corporation’, Reported In 1998 Air (Sc) 1125
High Court
15 Mar 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
List Has Been Revised v. U.p. Forest Corporation’, Reported In 1998 Air (Sc) 1125
Date of order
15 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In List Has Been Revised v. U.p. Forest Corporation’, Reported In 1998 Air (Sc) 1125, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
WPMS No. 127/2012
Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.
List has been revised.
None appears for the petitioner, even in the revised call.
Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate present for the respondent.
Counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 252 of Income Tax Act, 1961. In this regard, learned counsel for the respondent referred judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of ‘Commissioner of Income Tax vs. U.P. Forest Corporation’, reported in 1998 AIR (SC) 1125.
Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. Stay application (CLMA No. 547/12) also stands disposed of.
NCM:
(V.K. Bist, J.) 21.05.2013
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue