In Little Tradition v. Dy. Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal and the applications are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI27. + ITA 442/2011
LITTLE TRADITION
Through: None.
..... Appellant
versus
DY. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX
Through: None.
..... Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
% 10.02.2016
ITA 442/2011 & CM No. 4295/2011 (for condonation of delay in filing -the appeal) & CM No. 4296/2011 (for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal)
1. This matter was adjourned sine die with liberty to the Appellant to seek
revival after disposal of an application filed by the Appellant under Section
254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2. Today none appears for the Appellant.
ITA No. 442/2011
Page 1 of 2
3. The Court does not see any reason to keep this appeal pending.
4. The appeal and the applications are dismissed for non-prosecution.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2016/dn
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
ITA No. 442/2011
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue