Lml Ltd., Mumbai v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range – 3, Mumbai
High Court
23 Sep 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Lml Ltd., Mumbai v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range – 3, Mumbai
Date of order
23 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Lml Ltd., Mumbai v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range – 3, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ttm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2278 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.867 OF 2008
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2279 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.869 OF 2008
LML Ltd., MumbaiVs.The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax,Special Range – 3, Mumbai
.. Appellant
.. Respondent.
Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the appellant
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the respondent
CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 23[rd] SEPTEMBER, 2011.
P.C.
1.By consent, Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a).
2. Notices of Motion are disposed of by fixing the appeals for hearing on
14.11.2011. Notices of Motion are disposed of accordingly.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue