Case LawHigh Court › Lok Housing And Construction Ltd v. The...

Lok Housing And Construction Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) Range-8(1) And Ors

High Court 22 Feb 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Lok Housing And Construction Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) Range-8(1) And Ors
Date of order
22 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Lok Housing And Construction Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) Range-8(1) And Ors, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In terms of the request made, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO. 1635 OF 2011 Lok Housing and Construction Ltd.Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax(OSD) Range-8(1) and ors. ...Petitioner ...Respondents Mr.Atul Jasani for petitionerMr.Suresh Kumar for respondents. CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. February 22, 2012. P.C. The counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that he has received instructions to withdraw the petition. A copy of the letter dated 17 February 2012 of the petitioner to the Advocate is placed on record. In terms of the request made, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan