In Lok Housing And Constructions Ltd v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax Range 8 (2) & Ors, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: F.B.Andhurujina with a/w Ms.Asifa Khan forPetitionersMr.B.M.Chatterjee i.b Mr.Suresh Kumar forRespondentsMr.Anand Bhalwal, Addl CIT (A) 8 (2) present which the petition was filed does not subsists and consequently, the Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
rng
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.2803 OF 2008
Lok Housing and Constructions Ltd. ..
..PetitionersVs.The Dy.Commissioner of Income TaxRange 8 (2) & ors.... Respondents
Mr. F.B.Andhurujina with a/w Ms.Asifa Khan forPetitionersMr.B.M.Chatterjee i.b Mr.Suresh Kumar forRespondentsMr.Anand Bhalwal, Addl CIT (A) 8 (2) present
which the petition was filed does not subsists and
consequently, the Petition is disposed of.
3. On behalf of the respondents, learned counselstates that the statement that the order ofattachment has not been continued is based on the
information given to him by Mr.Anand Bhalwal,
Additional CIT (A) 8 (2).
{ J.H.Bhatia, J }
{ F.I.Rebello, J }
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue