Case Law › High Court › Lokesh Kumar Singh v. Union Of India Thr...

Lokesh Kumar Singh v. Union Of India Through Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur

High Court 07 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

07 Sep 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Lokesh Kumar Singh v. Union Of India Through Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 502 / 2017 Lokesh Kumar Singh S/o Sh. Jagdish Singh, aged about 46 years, 81/33, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Central Revenue Building, Jaipur. 3. Tax Recovery Officer (I), Income Tax Department, Jaipur. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Taneja For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi with Mr. Aditya Vijay _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 07/09/2017 For the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, the same is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number. (INDERJEET SINGH),J. (K.S. JHAVERI),J. Brijesh 28.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.