Case Law › High Court › Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax 258 It...

Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax 258 Itr 770

High Court 07 Feb 2005 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Feb 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax 258 Itr 770, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2521 OF 1992 Udaipur Phosphates & Fertilizers Ltd. .. Petitioner V/s. U.K. Gupta, Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Special Range-27, Bombay and Anr. .. Respondents Ms. Arati Sathe i/b. Mr. Arun Sathe for the Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Kapoor for the Respondents CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondents. The learned counsel for the Petitioner fairly states that the issue involved in the present Petition is squarely covered against the Petitioner in a judgment of the Supreme Court inKarnataka Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax 258 ITR 770 Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax 258 ITR 770. In view thereof, Rule stands discharged. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.