Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others In Wp
High Court
05 Feb 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others In Wp
Date of order
05 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others In Wp, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) Petition is hereby allowed and disposed of in terms of WP.No.18438/2022 – Kodavoor Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha Ltd., v/s Commissioner of Income Tax and others.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byVANDANA SLocation:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 19030 OF 2022 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
KARAVALI CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.2-14-K1, ZEEZA KRIPA COMPLEX, KALLIANPURA SANTHEKATTE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576105 REP BY ITS C.E.O MR SHRIDHAR A SHETTY, AGE 59 YEARS.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHESH R UPPIN.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, ROOM NO.356, C R BUILDING, I P ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110 002.
2.ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 002. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 002.
3.INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND TPS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, ADI-UDUPI MALPE ROAD, UDUPI-576 103.…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUSHAL TIWARI., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PENALTY ORDER DT.29.03.2022 BEARING PAN NO. PASSED BY THE R2 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-G AND THE PENALTY DEMAND NOTICE DT.29.03.2022 BEARING PAN NO. ISSUED BY THE R2 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-H.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARYL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:
“a) ISSUE A WRIT in the nature of mandamus directing the Hon’ble Court of the VIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH15) to dispose of all pending applications and to dispose of the main suit in O.S.No.8065/2017 at the earliest and within an outer limit of 9 (nine) months from the date of disposal of the present Writ Petition; and
b) PASS such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Heard learned counsel for he petitioner and learned
counsel for he respondents and perused the material on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue in controversy between the parties is covered by judgment of this Court in the case of Kodavoor Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha
Ltd., v/s Commissioner of Income Tax and others in WP.No.18438/2022 dated 15.03.2023.
4. The said submission is placed on record.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute that
the issue is covered by the aforesaid judgment in Kodavoor
Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha Ltd., v/s Commissioner of Income Tax and others.
6. In view of the facts and circumstances, the present petition is also deserves to be allowed in part reserving liberty in favour of the respondents to pass necessary orders after disposal of the pending appeal preferred by the petitioner.
7. In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) Petition is hereby allowed and disposed of in terms of
WP.No.18438/2022 – Kodavoor Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha Ltd., v/s Commissioner of Income Tax and others.
(ii) The impugned penalty order at Annexure – G and demand notice at Annexure – H both dated 29.03.2022, are hereby quashed.
(iii) Liberty is reserved in favour of respondents to take necessary steps and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law
after disposal of the appeal preferred by the petitioner.
DHA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 30
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.