Case Law › High Court › Ludhiana Improvement Trust v. Commission...

Ludhiana Improvement Trust v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals-Ii), Ludhiana And Others

High Court 29 May 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

29 May 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ludhiana Improvement Trust v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals-Ii), Ludhiana And Others, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 271 case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10120 of 2014Decided on : 29.05.2014 Ludhiana Improvement Trust . . . Petitioner Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-II), Ludhiana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on May 27, 2014, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-II), Ludhiana has stayed the recovery of demand of `7,88,14,286/- on account of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The copy of the communication dated May 27, 2014 produced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. 2.In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 3.Ordered accordingly. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE May 29, 2014J.Ram (JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.