Case Law › High Court › Luxottica India Eyewear Pvt. Ltd v. Assi...

Luxottica India Eyewear Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr

High Court 25 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

25 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Luxottica India Eyewear Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI21 + W.P.(C) 4380/2017 & CM APPL. 19166/2017 LUXOTTICA INDIA EYEWEAR PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Purushottam Anand and Mr Parth, Advocates versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 25.07.2017 1. Mr. Purushottam Anand, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition in view of the subsequent developments. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn. S.MURALIDHAR, J JULY 25, 2017 rd PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.