Case LawHigh Court › M. C.a v. Asst. Commr It

M. C.a v. Asst. Commr It

High Court 26 Nov 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
M. C.a v. Asst. Commr It
Date of order
26 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M. C.a v. Asst. Commr It, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. M. C.A. No. 1135 of 2008 M/s Vali Constructions v. Asst. Commr IT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's ordersor directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr C.P. Sen, Adv for applicant.Mr Bangade, Adv for respondent. Coram: D.K. Deshmukh and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ Dated: 26[th] November 2008 Heard learned counsel for both sides. MiscellaneousCivil Application allowed in terms of its prayer clause. Judge. Judge. hsj
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan