Case Law › High Court › M. D. Saraf Securities Pvt. Ltd v. Incom...

M. D. Saraf Securities Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer Ward 4(3)(1) And Ors

High Court 07 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Dec 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In M. D. Saraf Securities Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer Ward 4(3)(1) And Ors, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: Therefore said order is quashed and set aside.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 148 case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

rsk 1 911-WP-2740-21.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2740 OF 2021 M. D. Saraf Securities Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 4(3)(1) and Ors. ...Respondents ------- Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Petitioner.Mr. Sham V. Walve for Respondents. ------- CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.DATED:7 DECEMBER 2021. P. C. : We have perused the notice dated 13/5/2021 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the said Act), objections filed bypetitioner vide its letter dated 24/5/2021 and the order dated 30/7/2021disposing the objections. 2.In the order dated 30/7/2021 impugned in the petition,respondent has not considered or dealt with any of the points raised bypetitioner. Therefore said order is quashed and set aside. Matter is rsk 2 911-WP-2740-21.doc remanded to the Assessing Officer who shall deal with every submissionsmade by petitioner in its reply dated 24/5/2021 and personal hearing begranted before passing order. 3. With the above directions petition disposed with no order as to cost. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J.) ( K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) Digitallysigned byRAJESHWARISUBODHRAJESHWARISUBODHKARVEKARVEDate:2021.12.0915:11:40+0530

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.