Case LawHigh Court › M K Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 4...

M K Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 44(1) Kolkata & Ors

High Court 01 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
M K Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 44(1) Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
01 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M K Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 44(1) Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 4896 of 2025 M K Agarwal Versus Income Tax Officer Ward 44(1) Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Avra Mazumder Ms. Alisha Das Ms. Elina Dey … For the petitioner. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharya Mr. Ankan Das Ms.Shradhya Ghosh … For the respondents 1. Challenging the order of assessment dated 11[th]March, 2024, passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) for the Assessment Year 2015-16, the instant writ petition has been filed. 2. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and noting that a specific appellate remedy has been provided for, I am of the view that there is no scope to decide on the issues raised in the writ petition. However, having regard to the fact that the writ petition is not entertained on the ground of alternative remedy, I am of the view that the petitioner should not be rendered remediless. 3. Accordingly, in the event, the petitioner prefers an appeal from the aforesaid order dated 11[th] March, 2024 before the appellate authority within a period of four weeks from date, upon compliance of all formalities, the appellate authority shall hear out and dispose of such appeal on its own merits. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the matter and the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. 5. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan