M. K. Cycle Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1)Through
High Court
03 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M. K. Cycle Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1)Through
Date of order
03 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In M. K. Cycle Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1)Through, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~9
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ITA 179/2017 & CM No.8338/2017
M. K. CYCLE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
..... AppellantThrough:Mr. Gagan Kumar, Advocate.
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(1)Through:
..... Respondent
Mr. Rahul Chaudhary andMs. Lakshmi Gurung, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRIO R D E R%03.03.2017
CM No.8338/2017 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed off.
ITA 179/2017
After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner soughtliberty to withdraw the appeal. Liberty is granted. The appeal is dismissedas withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
MARCH 03, 2017sb
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue