Case LawHigh Court › M. Kantilal And Exports v. Income Tax Se...

M. Kantilal And Exports v. Income Tax Settlement Commission

High Court 13 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
M. Kantilal And Exports v. Income Tax Settlement Commission
Date of order
13 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M. Kantilal And Exports v. Income Tax Settlement Commission, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20443 of 2017With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20444 of 2017With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20445 of 2017With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20446 of 2017 ========================================================== M. KANTILAL AND EXPORTS VersusINCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ========================================================== Appearance:MR TEJ SHAH(5743) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1NOTICE SERVED(4) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3UNSERVED WANT OF TIM(31) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA Date : 01/05/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.Through this note of speaking to minutes, it is pointed out that in our common order dated 13.03.2018 in Special Civil Application No.20443/2017 and connected petitions, through over-sight, appearance of the counsel for the Revenue was not shown. 2.It is provided that name of Mr. Nikunt Raval for Mrs. Kalpana Raval be shown in the cause-title of the order. The note stands disposed of accordingly. PRAVIN KARUNAN (AKIL KURESHI, J) (B.N. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan