Case LawHigh Court › M/ S. Herbicides (India) Limited v. Inco...

M/ S. Herbicides (India) Limited v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 25 Feb 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
M/ S. Herbicides (India) Limited v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
25 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/ S. Herbicides (India) Limited v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR D.B. Misc. Restoration Application No.303/ 2014 M/ s. Herbicides (India) Limited vs. Income Tax Officer Date of Judgment : 25.02.2015 REPORTABLEHON'BLE THE ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE MR.SUNI L AMBW ANIHON'BLE MR. JUSTI CE PRAKASH GUPTA Mr. Anant Kasliwal, counsel for applicant. 1.The Income Tax Appeal was dismissed on the ground that the paper book sets were not filed despite grant of time on31.01.2012. This Restoration Application has been filed withdelay of 805 days. We find that despite the dismissal of theAppeal for not filing the paper book on 31.01.2012, theapplicant had not filed paper book, and has not cared to file thepaper book, even with the present application. 2.The ground for condonation of delay of 805 days for not filing the paper book is that the appellant was not aware of thedismissal of the appeal. 3.On 31.01.2012, the Court passed the order that “let the paper book set be filed within a period of fifteen days, failingwhich the appeal shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench”. The order shows that thecounsel for the appellant was fully aware of the order dated31.01.2012 and its consequences. It is thus, difficult to believethat he was not aware of the consequential dismissal of theappeal in last three years. 4.We do not find any good ground to condone the delay of805 days in filing the restoration application. 5.The Restoration Application is thus, dismissed. ( PRAKASH GUPTA) ,J. ( SUNI L AMBW ANI ) ,ACTI NG C.J. MohitM/ 2All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.Mohit Tak, P.A.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan