Ma/117/2020 Of Ridhi Shidhi Fincon Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna
High Court
19 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Ma/117/2020 Of Ridhi Shidhi Fincon Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna
Date of order
19 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ma/117/2020 Of Ridhi Shidhi Fincon Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.117 of 2020
======================================================
Ridhi Shidhi Fincon Private Limited, a company registered under theCompanies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Flat No. 112-113, TriveniApartment, East Boring Canal Road, Patna-800001, P.O.- G.P.O., P.s.- BudhaColony, Patna-800001, through its Director namely Vijay Sighania, agedabout 74 years, male, son of Late Panna Lal Singhania, permanent resident ofFlat No. 73, Surya Apartment, Frazer Road, Patna-800001, P.O.- G.P.O., P.s.-Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800001
Versus
... ... Appellant/s
1.Commissioner of Income Tax, Patna
2.Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1, Patna
3.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-2, Patna
219-02-2021
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Mr.Ajay Kumar Rastogi, Advocate Mr. Parijat Saurav, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mrs.Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMARORAL ORDERORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated6.12.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patnain I.T.A. No. 70/Pat/2017.
Shri Ajay Kumar Rastogi, learned counsel for theappellant, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal forthe reason that the appellant has taken recourse to alternative
sujit/-
U
remedy available under law.
Permission is granted.
The present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.