Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Ma/187/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax And A v. M/S Saran Holdings Pvt.ltd
Date of order
01 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
In Ma/187/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax And A v. M/S Saran Holdings Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.185 of 2006====================================================== 1.Commissioner Of Wealth Tax. .... .... Appellant/s Versus M/S Saran Holdings Pvt.Ltd .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Miscellaneous Appeal No.187 of 2006====================================================== Commissioner Of Income Tax & A .... .... Appellant/s Versus M/S Saran Holdings Pvt.Ltd. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In MA No.185 of 2006) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Harswardhan Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha.. (In MA No.187 of 2006) For the Appellant/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA)
–Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner appellant and perused the order passed by Division Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna.
6 01-11-2012
In our opinion, no substantial question of law arises to be decided in appeal.
Thus the Misc. Appeal is accordingly, dismissed.
(Prakash Chandra Verma, J)
Sudha/-
(Jayanandan Singh, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.