Case LawHigh Court › Ma/358/2017 Of Income Tax Officer, Ward...

Ma/358/2017 Of Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 1, Patna v. M/S Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna

High Court 18 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Ma/358/2017 Of Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 1, Patna v. M/S Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna
Date of order
18 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ma/358/2017 Of Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 1, Patna v. M/S Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

5 18-09-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.358 of 2017 ====================================================== Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 1, Patna CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Finance brought out a Circular dated 08.08.2019, wherein the litigation policy insofar as not filing an appeal before the High Courtwhere the monetary stake is less than one crore rupees. Thisapplies squarely in the above case. 2. The monetary limit of the litigation policy having not been exceeded, we are of the opinion that the appeal has tobe closed, but however, leaving the question of law open. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan